Harassment & Guest ID Abuse Ignored by Admins
PART 1: Banned User Returns And Admins Watch Silently
Despite being officially banned from the Hindi room, the user Gangster keeps rejoining using guest IDs.
This isn’t speculation it’s visible. Today, he joined again, and what’s more surprising?
Admins were present and active.They saw him in real-time.
Still, they didn’t ban him.
Evidence:

This raises a serious question:
If banned users are allowed to casually return…
what’s the point of banning them in the first place?
PART 2: The Moment I Joined, the Abuse Started Again
When I joined the room,
the same cycle repeated
:* Slurs* Poking* Spam* Verbal harassment
Gangster and his friend SideSpace both started attacking again
proving that the ban didn’t teach them anything and that guest IDs are just a loophole they exploit.
Evidence:


Enabling Abuse Is Also Abuse Admin Should Be Held Accountable
That admin had one simple job
stop a known, banned spammer from entering again.
But she chose to ignore it.
If someone knowingly lets a criminal walk into a room, aren't they equally responsible?
This kind of negligence encourages abuse.
I request that her badge be revoked. Being an admin is not just about presence it’s about protection.
Giving chances to known abusers means giving them a license to repeat the crime.
Evidence:
See Admin And That Spammer in this pic
He is not only spammer
He is cyber criminal
Admin Are Also Responsible For Ignoring Him Always And Allowing Him To Site

The Real Problem: Giving Them Another Chance Means Encouraging Abuse
Letting this person enter again even once is not “mercy.” It’s an open invitation for repeated trauma and a direct attack on peaceful users.
So here's my final request Whenever Gangster is seen In any form Please ban him immediately.No guest IDs.No trial period.No second chances. A banned user must stay banned or it’s a mockery of the system.
I am posting this because I still believe in the idea of a fair and safe chatroom.
Please prove that belief right.
@Hades @Aphrodite @Nilaani @Pinkcandy @Lonewolf

PART 1: Banned User Returns And Admins Watch Silently
Despite being officially banned from the Hindi room, the user Gangster keeps rejoining using guest IDs.
This isn’t speculation it’s visible. Today, he joined again, and what’s more surprising?
Admins were present and active.They saw him in real-time.
Still, they didn’t ban him.
Evidence:

This raises a serious question:
If banned users are allowed to casually return…
what’s the point of banning them in the first place?
PART 2: The Moment I Joined, the Abuse Started Again
When I joined the room,
the same cycle repeated
:* Slurs* Poking* Spam* Verbal harassment
Gangster and his friend SideSpace both started attacking again
proving that the ban didn’t teach them anything and that guest IDs are just a loophole they exploit.
Evidence:


Enabling Abuse Is Also Abuse Admin Should Be Held Accountable
That admin had one simple job
stop a known, banned spammer from entering again.
But she chose to ignore it.
If someone knowingly lets a criminal walk into a room, aren't they equally responsible?
This kind of negligence encourages abuse.
I request that her badge be revoked. Being an admin is not just about presence it’s about protection.
Giving chances to known abusers means giving them a license to repeat the crime.
Evidence:
See Admin And That Spammer in this pic
He is not only spammer
He is cyber criminal
Admin Are Also Responsible For Ignoring Him Always And Allowing Him To Site

The Real Problem: Giving Them Another Chance Means Encouraging Abuse
Letting this person enter again even once is not “mercy.” It’s an open invitation for repeated trauma and a direct attack on peaceful users.
So here's my final request Whenever Gangster is seen In any form Please ban him immediately.No guest IDs.No trial period.No second chances. A banned user must stay banned or it’s a mockery of the system.
I am posting this because I still believe in the idea of a fair and safe chatroom.
Please prove that belief right.
@Hades @Aphrodite @Nilaani @Pinkcandy @Lonewolf
Last edited: